Some people are lucky with their relatives, while others are not so lucky. Those who are lucky will understand the popular aphorism “hunger is not an aunt.” People who are not familiar with good relations with relatives, they still do not realize the full depth of the proverb we are considering. In any case, we will do a little research for both. In it we will reveal the meaning and significance of the connection between good relatives and hunger.

Knut Hamsun, "Hunger"

Hunger is a terrible condition if it plagues a person for long enough. To avoid starvation, people steal and sometimes kill. A person needs to eat three times a day or at least two times. Some people manage to eat once a day, but this is only when circumstances force it.

Literature provides vivid examples of the fact that hunger is not a problem. First of all, this is Knut Hamsun’s novel “Hunger”. The ending of the novel is quickly erased from memory, but the masterful descriptions of a man who has not eaten for several days remain with the reader forever.

The most interesting thing is that Hamsun's character is a journalist. He needs to write in order to eat, but he cannot write a single article because he is hungry. The letters merge. Abdominal cramps and pain interfere with work. It’s not for nothing that Hamsun is called the “Norwegian Dostoevsky,” for he describes the hero’s ordeals with amazing psychological accuracy, bordering on meticulousness. The man in the classic novel would agree, not thinking that hunger is not an issue.

Charles Bukowski

The creator of autobiographical novels, Charles Bukowski, also knew firsthand what hunger was, for the hero of most of his novels constantly wants to eat, but as soon as he has money, he immediately goes down to the nearest bar. Nevertheless, Book (as his friends lovingly called the founder of “dirty realism”) argues in his writings with two common truths: firstly, the artist must be hungry all the time in order to create something out of the ordinary; secondly, “a full belly is deaf to learning.” Answering both arguments at once, he concludes: a) hunger is not a problem; b) he personally works better when he eats a good portion of boiled potatoes with meat or sausages.

Sergey Dovlatov

Sergei Dovlatov also does not lag behind foreign authors. Somewhere in the vastness of his not very impressive, but sparkling prose, the image of a hungry journalist who, sitting in the park, longingly looks at swans swimming in a pond and is already trying out how best to catch them, is lost.

But everything ends well: the hero meets a rich, middle-aged lady who takes care of his food supply. You say: “Alphonse!” But what to do, the proverb “hunger is not your aunt” speaks the truth.

By the way, Dovlatov claims in notebooks that this story had a real prototype and everything was exactly as described. However, we promised to talk about relatives and hunger, so we will engage in direct linguistic interpretation.

Relatives and hunger

The saying “hunger is not an aunt” implies that a person good relatives, and they will definitely feed him and cuddle him if necessary. The same cannot be said about hunger - it is merciless and torments a person inexorably until he satiates his belly. Such a blissful picture was probably where the saying came from. The situation is pleasant because the person has relatives who will not let him disappear just like that.

Now, when a person is overwhelmed by the spirit of competition and the thirst for profit, all family relationships go to hell. “Man is a wolf to man,” said the Roman sage, and he was absolutely right. Apparently, in ancient Rome The relations between people were not very pleasant.

In other words, we are very happy for those who have somewhere to go. With each round of capitalism (especially in Russia), people are rapidly dehumanized and individualized. Connections between people are severed. People turn into islands in the ocean of life, drifting on their own. Observing such a bleak picture, you involuntarily think: what will happen if aunts, uncles, and parents suddenly disappear from the world? To whom will the starving wanderer go?

Hunger is not a thing

(he won’t slip the pie)

The hungry and the ruler will steal bread.

Wed. If they forcibly take me to the dining room, I still won’t eat!.. “What a scoundrel!” Hunger is not a thing... will eat! Lead me to the dining room!"

Saltykov. Poshekhonskaya antiquity. 19.

Wed. I’ll go into the hut, if the door is not locked, and see if there’s anything to eat! The economy may not be good, but hunger is not my aunt.

Gr. A. Tolstoy. Book Silver.

Wed. Hunger is not a thing, something needs to be done.

Ostrovsky. Poverty is not a vice. 12.

Wed. The family is poor, and hunger, you know,

Not your brother...

Zhukovsky. Mat. Falcone.

Wed. Hunger is Unger.

Hungarian hunger (merciless, like the ancient Hungarian warrior).

Russian thought and speech. Yours and someone else's. Experience of Russian phraseology. Collection of figurative words and parables. T.T. 1-2. Walking and apt words. Collection of Russian and foreign quotes, proverbs, sayings, proverbial expressions and individual words. St. Petersburg, type. Ak. Sci.. M. I. Mikhelson. 1896-1912.

See what “hunger is not an aunt” in other dictionaries:

Adverb, number of synonyms: 1 hungry (12) ASIS Dictionary of Synonyms. V.N. Trishin. 2013… Synonym dictionary

hunger is not my aunt- joking. about severe hunger, forcing some action. A proverb is part of an extended proverb-type expression written down in the 17th century. and clear in its content: hunger is not the aunt, the pie will not be slipped, that is, the aunt (godmother ... Phraseology Guide

Hunger is not an aunt (she won’t slip a pie). Hungry, and the ruler will steal bread. Wed. If they force me into the dining room, I still won’t eat!... “What a fever!” Hunger is not my auntie... she will eat! Lead me to the dining room!” Saltykov... ... Michelson's Large Explanatory and Phraseological Dictionary (original spelling)

Hunger is not an aunt (not mother-in-law, not godfather), and will not slip you a pie. See FOOD...

Hunger is not an aunt, the belly is not a basket. See FOOD... IN AND. Dahl. Proverbs of the Russian people

- (you will not leave). See FOOD... IN AND. Dahl. Proverbs of the Russian people

Husband. greed, urge to eat, insatiability, need for food, satiation; natural feeling of urge to eat; | lack of food, need, shortage of food, scarcity of bread. They had a famine then, a time of need and hunger. We endure hunger and cold. Hunger will affect... Dictionary Dahl

Hunger strike, hunger strike, hunger strike; lack of bread, lack of food, shortage of crops, crop failure; need, lack; greed, appetite. Hungry year. From hunger. Hunger is not your aunt, hunger is not your brother. Wed... Synonym dictionary

hunger- go/loda and go/lodu, only units, m. 1) A strong feeling of the need for food, for food. Feel hungry. Satisfy your hunger. 2) Long-term malnutrition. Die of hunger. Synonyms: hunger / hunger, hunger / hunger (colloquial) ... Popular dictionary of the Russian language

aunt- Hunger is not an aunt (proverb) you cannot live by starving without earning money. Hunger is no big deal, something needs to be done. A. Ostrovsky... Phraseological Dictionary of the Russian Language

Books

• Free Foresters, Yuri Blinov. The main work of the new book “Free of the Forest” is an epic novel of the same name. The narration is told from the perspective of main character The Govorovnas are representatives of the Forest Nenets. Beautiful,...
• Summer is around the corner (audiobook CD), Marina Starchevskaya. “Summer is just around the corner” is the most ordinary day of preschooler Seryoga, a cheerful prankster and dreamer. He knows what a yard cat and a domestic dog dream about, how a dinosaur grows and where the stars live...

Three sources, three components

It would seem that everything is simple, not a Newton binomial. To normalize weight, you need to normalize your relationship with food. To normalize your relationship with food, you need, in fact, three important things - to find out and understand how I eat and what I eat, to understand what is happening with my body image (people who are globally dissatisfied with the way they look, not extra pounds on stomach or thighs, and themselves in general, are much more likely to “break down” and periodically gain a kilogram - in revenge on their own body for being so unattractive) and allow the choice of food, time and volume of food to be controlled by the body, that is, by the feeling of hunger.

If you are addicted to food, if you have experience of emotional eating, binge-eating or compulsive overeating, then I give you a hand in cutting off that your relationship with the feeling of hunger is complex.

It is possible that you have completely forgotten. When was the last time it was tested? You “enjoy” this or that food so many times a day that you have completely lost this feeling. Or perhaps you unconsciously try to avoid hunger. Because it makes you feel anxious. As we have already discussed in previous materials, the feeling of hunger has a very long evolutionary and social history. From point of view caveman- Feelings of hunger should be avoided as much as possible. From the point of view of Homo sapiens, the feeling of hunger is a dangerous, threatening experience. You can die from hunger, you can get seriously ill. From the point of view of modern man, hunger is simply a guard. This is evidence that - time! - you have a body (and if it is not the kind that you and other people like, if it does not meet the standards - beware!), two! - it, the scoundrel, demands its own. He needs food, evidence that you don't eat butterflies and pollen, that you need calories. Evidence that once you start eating, you, like any other person, are theoretically capable of gaining weight. If hunger doesn’t regulate food intake, then what does? Emotional state - once. I eat because I'm sad, lonely or angry, I eat as a reward for work done or vice versa, so that I can put off starting a task that I don't like, finally, I eat because I'm overtired, take responsibility and I can’t reschedule, and I need insulin bursts of energy to move on. We have already discussed these reasons earlier.

What else regulates your food intake? In situations where nutrition is not controlled by hunger, anything is controlled by it.

I eat for company. My husband came home from work, the children came from school, I’m not hungry, but I eat because it’s a way of communication or a means of structuring this communication.
I eat because the social situation pushes me to do so. I came to visit, and it’s inconvenient to refuse. Guests came to me, and it would be inhospitable not to feed them.
I eat because the food is in front of my nose, and since it’s there, I’ll eat it (what almost all compulsive eaters note is that if it’s not good for me to eat, I shouldn’t have it in the house).
I eat because I'm used to it certain actions in my life are accompanied by food. A Saturday grocery shopping trip, a trip to the cinema with the children and much more puts us in front of many cultural food establishments that so temptingly open their doors to us - we don’t have to cook, we don’t have to put away the dishes, and we’re still here...
I eat because I'm thirsty, and I'm not used to distinguishing thirst from hunger. I eat because I'm cold, I eat because I have a headache, I interpret every signal from my body that isn't hunger as hunger because I'm too anxious or too difficult to accept hunger as it is.

How does hunger make you feel when you do experience it? Watch yourself, this is very important to understand.

These experiences can be so conflicting that the slightest feeling of hunger will cause great discomfort: no, I don’t want to think that I have a body, I don’t want to admit that I need calories! As a result, I will constantly “bite”, eat not at those moments when I am hungry, but when I am hungry, I will resist this feeling with all my might and chew a cabbage leaf. True, the feeling of hunger tends to only intensify from attempts to feed him a cabbage leaf, and the result will be a food breakdown - cookies, ice cream, candy, a bowl of Olivier salad with fresh bread... Then the cycle will repeat, and so on many times.

Wisdom of the Body: An Old Experiment

When a child is born, he has completely clear unconscious ideas about what he needs for a healthy and nutritious diet - if you do not interfere with the process of his nutrition. However, the more developed the world calls itself, the more adults tend to interfere in the process of feeding children, subordinating it to their convenience, the opinion of popular pediatricians, development standards, tables and charts. The results of the following experiment at one time had an extremely supportive effect on my weakened maternal psyche - one day I happened to become the mother of a boy who, at the age of one, one and a half and two years, ate practically nothing. Grandmothers and pediatricians brought all sorts of blasphemy on me, my sandbox comrades boasted about their cheeky babies and the volume of food they ate, and I was looking for an answer to the question - why is it different here, why doesn’t my child eat a bowl of buckwheat porridge for lunch, like the neighbor’s, but is content with two banana slices or dried?

The answer was found in the description of the most famous, large-scale and long-lasting dietary experiment of the century, conducted in 1928 by Clara Davis (a description of the experiment in Russian can be read in the book Feeding the Child by William and Martha Sears, an article by Davis herself about the results). Davis observed small (aged 6 to 11 months) residents of a special nutritional kindergarten organized for the purposes of this experiment for 6 years. The participants in the experiment were children of single mothers who were unable to support and provide for their children, and children of teenage mothers from unwanted pregnancies. Most of the children suffered from severe anemia and significant underweight, rickets and other disorders that usually accompany poor nutrition. Every meal, every bite of what every child ate was recorded throughout these six years, which ultimately amounted to about 38 thousand “food diary” entries.

Food was offered to the children, but was never forced in any way. Food was placed in certain places, in full view of the children. Nurses who cared for babies who were not yet able to walk never actively offered food to children. Only if the child clearly reached for a certain type of food, he received it in a spoon. If the child refused to eat, the spoon was immediately removed. Children who could walk independently could freely approach and choose any types and combinations of food that they liked. The food offered was absolutely natural, each type of food was a single product - combinations and mixing of products were not allowed. Why? To make sure that the child has chosen a specific, specific product for its sake nutritional value. Therefore, the experimental diet contained whole grains, but no bread. All types of food were unsalted, salt was served in a separate bowl like any other food, and the children could choose it if they wanted. Among the products offered were vegetables and fruits, several types of meat and organ meats (kidneys, liver), whole grain flakes and cereals, milk and fermented milk products.

The first discovery of the experiment, now widely known as scientific fact about the nutrition of children, it became that children consume an uneven amount of calories throughout the day, week or month. One day they can eat double their daily calorie intake, the next they barely get half of it. On one day, the caloric content of what was eaten could reach the norm due to the consumption of a small amount of foods with high calorie value, for example, meat or cereals, on another - due to vegetables and fruits eaten in large quantities.

None of the little subjects' eating styles followed the Institute of Pediatrics' dietary guidelines for their age, and no diet was similar to the other. Each child ate differently. These little scoundrels didn’t care about nutritional standards. They ate stewed liver, washed down with milk and a couple of hard-boiled eggs at night. They happily placed a banana slice on top of the potatoes and devoured this nutritionist's nightmare with gusto.

It was found that, in comparison with the statistics of other children's institutions, the children participating in the experiment rarely and rarely got sick and experienced minor health problems typical for this age. Constipation was unknown in this kindergarten. There were no cases of vomiting or diarrhea. During the experiment, viral infections such as influenza that children fell ill with were mild and lasted no more than 3 days. It was noted that children ate an unusual amount of food during recovery from infections. fresh meat, milk and fruit.

Of course, the participants in the experiment underwent regular and detailed medical examinations, which noted an increase in hemoglobin in the blood to normal levels, normalization of calcium and phosphorus levels, excellent calcification of children's bones, which before the experiment suffered from rickets, in some cases in an advanced stage, and most strikingly that the children gained weight to the required age level, but nothing more. Of course, there were thinner and more solidly built participants in the group, but neither emaciation nor obesity was noticed. One of the doctors involved in the medical evaluation of the participants subsequently wrote an article in a reputable pediatric journal, calling the experimental group "a group of the most physically and behaviorally healthy representatives human species"that he had ever seen.

And the food did it all. Or rather, intuitive body settings that allow you to choose exactly the type of food that suits your needs. this moment most needed by the body. The children did not receive any types of vitamins, not even fish oil, and no hardware methods of improving health known at that time (UV lamps, heating, etc.).

Subsequently, a number of nutritional experiments were carried out with children, which showed the exceptional ability of the human body, “unspoiled” by nutritional standards, to independently regulate the level and type of food consumption.

Based on this idea, a method was developed to help compulsive overeaters return to the intuitive settings of their own bodies. If a person suffering from a disturbed relationship with food can learn to recognize his own feeling of hunger, nuance it, eat exactly what his hunger requires at the moment, and stop at the moment of satiety, then the result will be physical and mental satisfaction, the end of dieting cycles. gluttony and normalization of relationships with food.

Hunger is not an aunt, but a friend, comrade and brother

Hunger, as a physiological “event” of the body, is regulated by the hypothalamus - a tiny part of the brain located in its depths and is mainly localized. in the stomach. This means that “hungry in the head”, “bored in the mouth” and “grandmother will be offended if I don’t eat this cutlet” are by no means physiological events and have nothing to do with hunger. Now, while reading these lines, put your hand on the place where you feel hungry. Where did your hand go? The stomach is located just above the abdominal area, literally half a hand above the abdomen. If the hand is there, everything is fine. And it happens that the hand points to the area above the stomach, discomfort in which is regarded as hunger. This is not hunger, but anxiety, a feeling that people with eating disorders most often interpret as hunger.

The next step is to take inventory of the bodily sensations associated with hunger. Take a piece of paper, sit down and describe what signs of hunger you are able to experience (most of you have already done this in the previous exercise, so just open the appropriate entry).

* Stomach growls
* Feeling of emptiness in the stomach
* Sucking feeling in the stomach
* Weakness
* Dizziness, headache
*Irritability
* Trembling in limbs

Please note that absolutely all the signs of hunger that you wrote down are bodily sensations, or sensations, in a smart way. Please also note that if you only write down trembling, headache or weakness, then these are signs of extremely intense hunger, and this means that you do not recognize its milder forms, and listen to ted only when hunger becomes extreme -intense. How to deal with this? How to capture more subtle sensations? Listen to your body over the course of a day or two and try to catch when your stomach feels empty or begins to growl - these are more or less accurate signs that you are hungry. At the same time, on an emotional level, and this is important to note, anything can happen to you. We are hungry no matter what happens in our mental life. Any change in the feeling of hunger in response to events in mental life (not only gluttony, but also anorexia, the inability to eat in response to stress) may be signs of a breakdown in this system.

Now we will learn to recognize the intensity of the feeling of hunger that I am experiencing at the moment. To do this, we will use this scale:

I’m dying of hunger - Extremely hungry - Hungry - Slightly hungry (would like to eat something) - Neither hungry nor full - Not particularly hungry - Full - Fully full (stomach full to capacity) - Overeaten

Copy or print out this scale for yourself on a small piece of paper that you can carry with you. For 3-4 days in a row, take it out as often as possible and determine the intensity of your hunger now. I know that many obesity treatment programs and books dedicated to overcoming overeating offer similar scales in numerical equivalent, from 1 to 10, and advise “only eat if your hunger is at level 8 or above,” for example. This strategy is categorically not suitable for compulsive eaters and bingers, because, as we have already established earlier, most of these people are extremely inclined to try to satisfy the needs of other people. Having self-esteem dependent on the opinions of others, a compulsive eater will try to “be good” and eat only if the feeling of hunger has an intensity of 3 or 4, or, conversely, suffer from a feeling of guilt, since “he was full to level 10.” Any attempts to put bodily sensations into numbers lead to what we are trying to get rid of - they increase the distance between consciousness and body.

Once you begin these observations, you may notice several typical phenomena.

First, often compulsive eaters only recognize hunger when they are actually nearly dying from it. If you wait until this moment, then a physiological state occurs when the body needs food so desperately that it becomes completely irrelevant what kind and how much - any, the more, the better. In this state, no matter how hard you try, you will not be able to determine what exactly you need right now to get enough - as the children did in Clara Davis's experiment. This condition carries a huge risk of overeating, and this is what most often happens to those who like to go on a strict diet.

Another typical state - neither hungry nor full - is very often interpreted by people with eating disorders as hunger. They automatically think that if they don't feel overly full, have a heaviness in their stomach, or feel drowsy, then they are hungry. It’s hard to imagine, but there are states in which the body experiences balance and stability - this is not a state of satiety, but this is not hunger. Between the state of “I’m dying of hunger” and the state of “neither hungry nor full” are precisely those points on the scale when it is best to make the decision to eat something. It is advisable not to bring yourself to the “extremely hungry” state, but to eat something else on the way to it. It is in these states that your body is able to receive its best. the most accurate decisions about that. what exactly do you need to eat now? It is the food consumed in this way that is absorbed optimally.

Please note: you are trusting your body to make food decisions, and this is exactly what responsibility means, as opposed to control. Time (it’s time to eat), social situations (my mother-in-law won’t survive if I don’t eat the pie), food itself (it lies under my nose, it’s so tasty, but after half an hour it won’t be there anymore, because the children or colleagues at work will eat everything) stop controlling your eating behavior, and rightly so, because what do they know about your body and its needs. Calorie counting tables and lists of allowed foods no longer control your behavior, because you are an individual, and you definitely do not fit into any of these tables. In this mode, you can eat absolutely everything; there are simply no prohibited foods.

To simplify the process of “tuning in” to recognizing the desired states, imagine a large glass of water. It's half full (or half empty?). As your hunger increases, the level of water in the glass decreases. The task is to catch this moment and fill the glass again to the level when it becomes half-empty (or is it still half-empty?).

Our entire food history, both phylogenetic, that is, historical, and anthropogenetic, that is, individual, available to everyone personally, forces us to forget how to listen and ask the body when and what it wants. Eat while they last! If you don’t finish, you won’t leave the table! For mom, for dad, for Aunt Sonya! All this experience teaches us NOT to listen to what we really need, and therefore we end up where we find ourselves - having quarreled with the body, having made food, fuel for the body and a means of obtaining pleasure and energy, a black demon tempting the poor of us, an enemy of the race human.

Hunger is not an aunt

Analogues of sayings about hunger, which is not an aunt

• Hunger is driving the world
• Hunger is not an aunt, the belly is not a basket
• Hunger is not an aunt, and the belly is not a basket
• Hunger is not an aunt, the soul is not a neighbor
• Hunger is not a neighbor: you can’t escape it
• Hunger is not an aunt, it will make you talk
• Hunger is a grumpy godfather: it gnaws until it gets to you
• Hunger is not an aunt, it will make you work
• Hunger drives the wolf out of the forest (into the village).
• Hunger is not an aunt, she won’t put a ball on you
• Hunger will not run away into the forest
• Hunger doesn't make your stomach bloat, but it's more fun on an empty stomach
• Hunger is not my aunt, frost is not my brother
• The belly will not burst from hunger, it will only shrink
• They don't die of hunger, they just swell

“Hunger is not an aunt,” says the people, and adds: “The stepmother is fierce, but hunger is fiercer!” (E. A. Salias “On Moscow”)

Application of proverbs in literature

— “They were guarding them, but hunger was no problem - they broke off crusts of bread for themselves, and for future use.”(Daniil Granin “Bison”)
— “I used to think that hunger is not my aunt, but it turns out that my aunt is hunger.”(Vasily Grossman “Life and Fate”)
— “Nothing. Hunger is not a thing. “I see,” the woman did not immediately say and walked away, seemingly losing interest in both the frogs in the hat and both men.”(Vasil Bykov “Wolf Pit”)
— “But if hunger is not your aunt, then cold is also not your uncle, do you agree?”(Vladimir Sanin “Don’t say goodbye to the Arctic”)
— ““It’s enough, isn’t it,” I thought, listening, “for example, isn’t it according to the proverb: “hunger is no help”?”(I. A. Goncharov “Frigate “Pallada”)

It so happened that my range of interests is somewhat wider than just computers or web design. In general, it is human nature to be interested in many things, to search, to find. What am I talking about? - Sometimes I think about “where did” this or that phrase, word or statement that we all know from childhood come from? With this little article I will open a new section “”. I will also include my previously written note “Ktomado, or creativity in tongue twisters.”

Remember the saying “Hunger is not an aunt”? Of course, there is Yandex and you can ask this question. That's what I did. And he found the answer. And since I have already referred to the original source, then without any twinge of conscience I allow myself to quote part of the text:

“It’s a strange expression, isn’t it? Somehow it is completely incomprehensible why hunger is compared specifically to the aunt, and not to some other relative.

The thing is that we have only a piece in front of us, the first half of the proverb. It reads in full: “Hunger is not an aunt, he won’t bring you a pie,” that is, don’t expect mercy from him.”

But personally, this explanation does not satisfy me either. Really, why auntie? That she is the closest, dearest and most loving relative? Why, for example, not mom? - In fact, the answer should be sought even further, into the depths of centuries. When Rus' was not yet baptized, this saying already existed. Many negative concepts, such as illness or death, could in no case be called by their proper names, so as not to offend. Death, for example, was called aunt (it’s clear why not mother, right?). Of course, many concepts are being replaced, but the original meaning of this saying is: “starving, of course, is bad, but it is still better than death.” Isn't that a completely different meaning?

There is another version that seems interesting to me: “Hunger is not an aunt, but a dear mother.” It talks about the benefits of fasting and the dangers of overeating. Well, our ancestors were anything but stupid.

Let me write in this article about another well-known phrase of V.I. Lenin, which we remember as: “The most important of all arts for us is cinema.” This is an example of the most shameless pulling out a piece of a phrase from a whole statement. The meaning is turned upside down if you quote it in its entirety. So, are you ready? In full it sounded like this: “While the people are illiterate, of all the arts, cinema and circus are the most important for us.” That is, cinema is valuable as an art not in itself, but only as an ideological tool to stupefy the population. It seems that modern television with its talk shows lives according to this Leninist testament.

6 comments on “Hunger is not a big deal?”

Well, you missed the point about “an ideological tool to stupefy the population.” What is the ideology in the film “The Diamond Arm”? Or in the movie Forrest Gump?
Lenin meant that cinema and circus are accessible to people different layers population and pass through an incomparably larger volume of people than an art exhibition.

• I really love the films you mentioned. I love others too. It’s just that when grandfather Lenin issued this slogan of his, these films did not yet exist. He meant the accessibility of cinema and circus to the general public precisely for the purpose of propaganda. Not everyone could read books and newspapers at that time.