the main objective creation The “Teach Good” project is about improving the morality of our society. Sounds global, doesn't it? But a natural question arises: how to do this?

First of all, we proceed from the position that the morality of society, as well as an individual person, can be changed both for the worse and for the worse. better side, providing appropriate information impact. In the 21st century greatest influence A person is influenced by the media throughout his life. That is why our main slogan is: “For the revival of morality in the media!”

The goal defines the main objectives of the project:

1. Demonstrate to the reader how the media and modern Mass culture manages people.

2. Develop in the reader the skill of consciously perceiving any information from the standpoint of answering the question “what does this teach?”

3. Create a platform to unite everyone who stands for traditional family values.

The site regularly publishes its own analytical materials and accumulates articles from other sources devoted to the analysis of popular information products from the perspective of answering the question “what does this teach?”

The site was created not only as a news publication, but also as structured database, which already allows you to find analytical analyzes famous films, songs, books. Getting to know them will allow you to take a fresh look at these information products, understanding the impact they have on you (positive or negative), and what exactly this impact is expressed in.

However, the site is not aimed at demonstrating only negative aspects today's culture. Of course, there are many works of art (this expression is appropriate here) that “teach good things”, and the distribution of which has a positive impact on the life of society. Similar materials on the site fall into the “Good” section.

As standard of moral norm, which defines the criteria of “good” and “bad,” the editors and authors are guided by traditional family values ​​for the Russian people: loyalty, love, hard work, respect for elders, the sanctity of motherhood, mutual assistance, kindness, healthy image life, honesty, generosity, responsibility.

Dear parents!

Let's not be indifferent to our children! After all, children are the future, and what it will be like tomorrow depends on what we invest in them today. There is no need to trust the raising of children to television; if possible, view all the information that your child watches, create a home video library (http://whatisgood.ru/tv/films/...), explain clearly why this or that content is harmful or useful . After viewing, discuss the picture and the characters with your child, ask: “What would you do in the place of this or that hero?” And most importantly, convey to the child the idea that live communication always better than TV!

Project “Teach Good”:

Another chapter of criticism of the Internet project “Teach Good,” in which I will continue to correct their ideological (let’s say) orientation. My opinion will be only my private opinion; anyone has the right to have their own opinion both about me and about this project. It is not surprising that some of the materials posted on the site do not in any way improve the morality of society. They invite everyone ideologically interested, who, when writing any article or review, must justify the positive, or negative sides film. What “this” teaches, or how “this” cripples. Each person has his own “cockroaches” and preferences - do not forget about the peculiarities of upbringing and moral principles. On the one hand, it’s good that there are generally people who spend their time writing detailed reviews: As you can see from the previous link, there are very few such people. But if the project really wants to influence the morality of society, then it’s time to worry about compiling a reference section. Just in case, I will indicate an article that is recommended to rely on when writing reviews. There are no complaints about the article itself: it is clearly written and well-founded. Its essence is in the title: what are family values? I wouldn’t write a review based on this incomplete manual - I don’t like one-sided opinions. Much is missing and needs clarification.

Yes, this is a screenshot from a cartoon. And don’t faint, this cut-to-edge animation style is still alive, and it’s all thanks to kind viewers. I have said more than once that not only content is important for a child, but also figurative design. Some psychologists, educators, and parents with many children agree with me. But then why do we show such cartoons to children? Why did the site editors leave this point without attention? In 2009, the director released a very similar cartoon. Since when did we start showing arthouse art (that is, original art, not a template, an experiment, etc.) to children?

Not so with Friends of Angels. This is the case, a little soft, because this slag deserves to be drowned in slop. By the way, the author is a girl about 23 years old (not sure, but the link indicates). What I mean is that the younger generation perhaps better distinguishes the line between real beauty and beauty imposed on us, but the thought needs confirmation. Author, write more.

Who doesn't know about British scientists? Every day they discover something new, or prove that the wheel is round. Everyone has heard about them! From a city schoolboy to a grandmother from a distant village. The term " British scientists"became a topic for jokes and sarcastic remarks. However, this article was seriously concerned negative impact such news has an impact on society. Everything seems to be written correctly, doesn’t it? Against the example given there (alcohol prolongs life), I will give similarly stupid ones, but based on logic. So: " Sometimes it's good to swear". Beneficial because it reduces excess stress." Miniskirts prolong life". True, because it is implied that the woman wearing them has a lot of sexual intercourse, and sex, as you know, prolongs life." Women who drink live longer"Possibly, because moderate consumption of wine has a positive effect on the heart - British scientists also (certainly) discovered this.

Behind letters on the topic of criticism of the project, can be tracked by tag.

Let's sort it out impartially!..

By the way, I didn’t find anything scary or bad in the “About the project” section. Morality, family values, conscious perception of any information, what is good and what is bad - with examples and reviews... And the logo is a kind of graphic representation of Vladimir Mayakovsky's poem "What is good and what is bad?"

Good and lofty goals, which, in theory, are instilled in the family from the cradle. (If you are not too lazy, you can watch a seven-minute video in which the authors of the project explain the mission “Teach Good”).

So, what's inside? And inside there is a lot of printed and video content, which can be divided into what is “good” and “bad”. In fact, the site even has special buttons, by clicking on which you can get to the corresponding sections.

There is a lot of content, on different topics, articles and videos that cover TV, books, print media, articles for those who have children, they all have one thing in common - “conspiracy theories and deception.”

Totally.

I honestly read a dozen articles taken from different sections, both “good” and “bad,” read the comments, went to the group in social network(there are already 90 thousand subscribers!)

Unfortunately, I can say that the “Teach Good” project is a manual on “How to become paranoid.” In everything, the authors look for malicious intent, the goal of fooling simple and honest people, and often pull facts and judgments by the ears. Most of all, I “liked” what they write about humorous programs... It turns out that they do not make fun of anything, while simultaneously entertaining, but “create defamatory images that quietly and imperceptibly creep into the subconscious, so that they can then shoot around the corner”!

The authors of the project call for a meaningful approach to information, and here it must be said what exactly do they mean by this? This means approaching with exactly the same understanding that the creators of the “Teach Good” project put into it. Other points of view are not welcomed, they are declared “wrong”, “thoughtless” and even “liberalistic”, although this is just a cleverly applied label.

Adherents of the project preach the point of view of the project, actively like those who mirror the opinions of the project’s authors in the comments, and actively convince people with a different point of view, and when common sense is not on their side, they point out the extreme degree of limitations of the opponent...

The world and information, according to the authors of the project, are divided very flatly, into white and black, and all complexity is denied or ignored. Such a simplification and assessment, including from the standpoint of supposed moral norms, leads precisely to the formation of a simplified understanding of the relationships between people, social and public phenomena and other aspects human life, i.e. distorts the worldview.

In general, propaganda that says that it is not propaganda at all. Propaganda of what? According to the idea of ​​good things, values, but the methods chosen are dubious, suggestive of sectarianism. Everything else that does not fit into the framework outlined by the project is proposed to be perceived as erroneous and condemned or denied altogether.

VERDICT: the site and the “Teach Good” project leave a rather negative impression with their categoricalness, one-sided judgments and bias. Adherents and participants of the project form a distorted picture of the surrounding world and society, hiding behind rationalism, enlightenment and moral values.

Creator Community

Hello, dear friends! The main goal of creating the “Teach Good” project is to improve the morality of our society. Sounds global, doesn't it? But a natural question arises: how to do this?

First of all, we proceed from the position that the morality of society, as well as an individual person, can be changed both for the worse and for the better, providing the appropriate information impact.

The goal defines the main objectives of the site:

Demonstrate to the reader how the media and modern mass culture control people.

To develop in the reader the skill of consciously perceiving any information from the perspective of answering the question “what does this teach?”

Create a platform to unite everyone who stands for traditional family values.

Traditional family values ​​were chosen as the standard of moral norm that determines the criteria of “good” and “bad.”

You can track the project's activities using the following links:

Thank you for your attention to the materials Teach Good and for your support.

Latest Blog Posts

Teach good

A week ago

What do BILLIE EILIS songs teach? Billie Eilish

In this video we will get acquainted with the work of a new world star named Billie Eilish, who is already being actively promoted, including in...

Teach good

A week ago

What is going on in the media and culture of our people?
Why is this happening there?
And what to do with all this? Dmitry Raevsky, chief...

Teach good

A week ago

IS THERE ENTERTAINMENT CONTENT?

Today all these mechanisms have become quite obvious. For example, for several years in a row, the world's main cinematographic award "Os...

...First of all, we must understand that the current situation in the field of mass culture was not formed in a random or chaotic manner, but is the result of a purposeful management process implemented through specific mechanisms: award institutions, financial flows and control over the central media.

Today all these mechanisms have become quite obvious. For example, for several years in a row the world’s main cinematic award “Oscar” in the nomination for best movie awarded to films about perverts. In particular, such paintings as: “ Moonlight", "Shape of Water", " Green Book"and others. These same films receive maximum positive publicity in major media, on the pages of which such terms as “propaganda of perversions” are not heard; on the contrary, the rhetoric is conducted purely in the plane of admiration for the acting, scenery, talent of the director and other minor points. Seeing all this from the outside, a person, even completely far from the field of cinema, must either make the absurd conclusion that it is films with an LGBT agenda that are shot in the most aesthetic way, or admit the fact that the motive for awarding the prize is clearly political in nature and has nothing society with the concept of art.

The system of major television, music and all other awards, including Russian ones, is built in a similar way. The majority of Internet resources dedicated to film evaluation, such as KinoPoisk, Film.Ru, Kinoteatr.Ru and others, are included in a similar matrix, since in them the evaluation of films in most cases comes down to the evaluation of their emotional impact(an alternative is presented on the KinoCensor website: https://kinocensor.ru/movie/dzhoker-11610). All this together creates favorable conditions for constant manipulation through the sphere of mass culture.

And at the heart of this process lies one big but very significant myth that there is so-called “entertainment content”, the task of which is simply to bring positive emotions, help a person rest and relax. While a person believes that he is just having fun, and this does not entail any consequences for his psyche and behavior, then he does not critically evaluate the information coming to him. By the way, this is especially noticeable in music. It often happens that a person knows the lyrics of a song by heart, but he has never thought about the meaning of the words imprinted in memory and even spoken by him, precisely because he treats this entire area without due attention, without assessing the message of the composition.

That is, the real goals of managing mass culture are hidden behind the false sign of “entertainment”, thanks to which it is possible to avoid discussing truly significant and primary issues: “what ideas and values ​​does the work promote”, “what attitudes does it form”, “how does it influence the mass audience”, “ what does it teach? and so on.

The main purpose of creation The site “Teach Good” whatisgood.ru is an increase in the morality of our society. Sounds global, doesn't it? But a natural question arises: how to do this?

First of all, we proceed from the position that the morality of society, as well as an individual person, can be changed both for the worse and for the better, providing the appropriate information impact.

The goal defines the main objectives of the site:

1. Demonstrate to the reader how the media and modern mass culture control people.
2. To develop in the reader the skill of consciously perceiving any information from the perspective of answering a question“What does this teach?”.
3. Create a platform to unite everyone who stands for traditional family values.

The site regularly publishes its own analytical materials and accumulates articles from other sources devoted to the analysis of popular information products from the perspective of answering the question “what does this teach?”

The site was created not only as a news publication, but also as structured database, which already allows you to find analytical analyzes of famous films, songs, books. Getting to know them will allow you to take a fresh look at these information products, understanding what impact they have on you (positive or negative), and what exactly this impact is expressed in.

However, the site is not aimed at demonstrating only the negative aspects of today's culture. Of course, there are many works of art (this expression is appropriate here) that “teach good things”, and the distribution of which has a positive impact on the life of society. Similar materials on the site fall into the “Good” section.

As standard of moral norm, defining the criteria of “good” and “bad”, editors and authors are guided by family values ​​traditional for the Russian people: loyalty, love, hard work, respect for elders, sanctity of motherhood, mutual assistance, kindness, healthy lifestyle, honesty, generosity, responsibility.

Contacts:

Due to the large number of emails we receive, we respond to them within 2-24 hours. Thank you for your understanding.

You can also contact us via